Psychological barriers to sustainable consumption play a critical role in the ongoing challenge of addressing climate change, and, when it comes to shifting consumer mindsets, they are one of the most difficult habits to change. 

 

In this article, some of what we’ll cover includes misinformation, social pressure, values and priorities, and costs—the influences often associated with achieving a sustainable lifestyle. 

Our behavior as consumers directly contributes to global emissions through how we shop, our product consumption, food choices, and many other individual actions. Yet, despite the widespread awareness of climate change, many of us consumers continue to face internal conflicts on what and how to buy, in the form of habit changes, perceived inconvenience, and cognitive dissonance. All of these can prevent us from making environmentally responsible choices. Understanding how and why we make these everyday choices is a vital aspect of having a lasting impact on our consumption behaviors and the environment.

Of course, consumers alone are not the ultimate solution to combating climate change; large corporations and political systems play a far more significant role in driving and perpetuating anthropogenic climate change.¹ However, our modern patterns of consumption have outgrown the Earth’s capacity, with the global production, transportation, and disposal of consumer goods significantly contributing to greenhouse gas emissions (GHGs). For example, per 2023 data from the United Nations Environment Programme, the fashion industry alone is responsible for 10% of global carbon emissions.² This is due to the manufacturing country of origin, the transportation of the clothing and raw materials, and, most significantly, the production of cheap materials, such as polyester, which is a synthetic fiber made from petroleum. Additionally, our food systems account for over 25% of our greenhouse gas emissions, with eating higher on the food chain (i.e., meat) being a significant contributing factor.³ Further, our overconsumption of food products and consumer goods leads to excessive waste and pollution, worsening environmental damage. As economies grow and consumer culture continues to expand, especially in high-income nations such as the United States, the demand for energy-intensive, cheap goods continues to increase. If we want to combat this ongoing consumer crisis, then we need to start deeply evaluating our mindsets and making changes to our actions as consumers. 

For instance, one of these changes comes in the form of boycotts of major corporations. A recent example of the power that we as consumers hold is the Target boycott due to their rollback of Diversity, Equity, and Inclusion or DEI initiatives. In the first quarter of 2025, Target saw a 4.8% decrease in the number of customers visiting Target stores per location, in addition to a 3.8% decrease in store sales during the quarter.⁴ Our power against large corporations comes in numbers, and that power is made evident by the damage that has been done to Target over the last six months. If consumers can boycott companies over their abolition of DEI, we can also do the same for climate values. 

According to research conducted by Elke Weber, a professor in energy and the environment and psychology and public Affairs at Princeton University, and Sander van der Linden, professor in social psychology at the University of Cambridge, the psychology behind consumption habits and decision-making is complex and is deeply rooted in both internal and external influences.⁵  There is a constant stream of factors to consider when making everyday decisions. External influences can include social pressures, social media trends, stigma surrounding sustainability, and political influences. Additionally, our basic human need to identify with others is often a huge driver in the decisions we make. Other influences that can be found internally include individual values, priorities, and awareness levels. 

Yet, individual action serves as a crucial foundation, often acting as a catalyst for broader community engagement and collective movement toward sustainability. An example of its impact can be found in a recent study that reported there has been a decrease in overall meat consumption by Europeans. The article stated that many Europeans “have made dietary shifts over the last two years to lead a more eco-friendly lifestyle,” with 29% of the participants in the study reporting decreasing their overall consumption of meat.⁶ Additional research that was conducted in the UK and Germany provides more data on Europe’s shifting mindset regarding meat consumption. According to a Statista report published in 2024, in the first six months of 2023, over 40% of Germans and 30% of UK consumers reported that they ate less or much less meat than before.⁷ Participants stated concerns about health, animal welfare, and the environment as the top three reasons for reducing their meat consumption.⁸ Recognizing and addressing the psychological foundation of consumer behavior is, therefore, essential in transitioning ourselves toward a more sustainable future.

 

Barriers to Behavior Change

Awareness 

_______________________________________________________________________

Awareness is one of the most important foundations for us as consumers to make sustainable choices, yet it can be surprisingly difficult to develop. The spread of misinformation, disinformation, and even the absence of visible feedback for our actions can all create barriers that make it harder for us to make informed decisions. From misleading marketing to the invisible impact of daily choices, this section examines the challenges we face in gaining clarity around sustainability and provides solutions for becoming more aware, informed, and empowered.

Mis/Disinformation 

A lack of knowledge of environmental issues and sustainable consumption habits, combined with widespread misinformation or deliberate disinformation, often puts up barriers for consumers to be able to make informed, sustainable choices. Misinformation is simply wrong or incorrect information, with no malicious intent behind the message, while disinformation is false information that has been deliberately misrepresented to mislead people.⁹ Often, in the case of “eco-friendly” products, companies use disinformation tactics, such as greenwashing, to convince customers that their company or product is environmentally friendly. Conflicting messages from the media, marketing tactics, and even government policies can create confusion among consumers about what actions are actually helping or harming the environment. Misinformation is also often found in greenwashing, which is when a company deceptively portrays itself as sustainable or environmentally friendly when they are not. 

A recent example of this can be found in a Shell advertisement published in August 2024, which targeted the UK, as seen in the photo below. It was called the “Powering Progress” campaign, and it promoted their investments in clean energy, installing electric vehicle (EV) chargers, and wind energy development.¹⁰ Despite Shell’s marketing campaign promoting clean energy investments—which, due to the lack of mention of its enormous fossil fuel production, implies that Shell is switching to being a green company—the company remains one of the world’s top carbon emitters. 

 

In fact, since 1965, Shell—alongside Chevron, Exxon, and BP—has been responsible for a combined 10% of global carbon emissions.¹¹ While the “Powering Progress” ad emphasized Shell’s so-called investments in wind energy and EV charging projects, it failed to mention that the vast majority of its operations still rely heavily on fossil fuel production. 

This type of selective messaging is a textbook example of greenwashing. The confusion that consumers face from having to dissect whether or not a company’s claims are true or not can become overwhelming and result in analysis paralysis, leaving consumers unable to make a clear decision.

As a result, many consumers will either give up on making changes or fall back into habits that feel familiar or convenient, even if they aren’t sustainable.¹² To combat this, education plays a crucial role in bridging the gap between consumer behaviors and sustainability by providing clarity, context, and actionable knowledge to everyday consumers. When we are equipped with the tools to navigate greenwashing and prioritize using credible sources, we are more likely to feel empowered rather than overwhelmed by the large amount of information that is available to us. 

 

Solutions 

Often, we must educate ourselves as consumers, since companies that want us to consume their products are not going to do it for us. The only person who is going to educate us about the environmental impact of products is ourselves, but luckily, there are ways for us to find accurate and trustworthy information. We can diversify our news sources, prioritize peer-reviewed scientific papers, go to consumer protection websites, and verify claims before accepting them at face value. In an age where misinformation spreads rapidly, especially on social media, developing strong media literacy and evaluating sources critically is essential to staying educated and being able to make the right consumption choices, and it also empowers us to distinguish credible climate science from misleading or biased narratives. Try checking out some of these resources listed here, and even if you don’t, try researching any claims that seem false or maybe not entirely true, rather than taking them at face value. 

 

Lack of Feedback  

Another common barrier to changing behavior is the lack of immediate feedback when making environmentally conscious shopping choices, whether it’s from our peers or from the environment itself. When people don’t see visible results from their sustainable actions, like reduced emissions, it can lead to discouragement or doubt that their actions actually have any impact. This may weaken individuals’ motivation and increase their sense of futility.¹³ Additionally, when the environmental consequences are delayed or aren’t being directly experienced by someone, which is common in privileged or protected communities, then we begin to assume that our actions aren’t actually that necessary.

Similarly, if many people make changes to their actions and adopt sustainable habits, and we avoid direct experience or short-term consequences, then people may believe that there simply wasn’t a problem to begin with. 

For example, a common environmentally friendly tactic that people practice is bringing reusable bags to the store or avoiding buying single-use plastic bottles, yet they never really see the immediate impact of these choices. The plastic waste that they avoided doesn’t visibly accumulate in front of them, and they aren’t typically witnessing firsthand the harm that these actions prevent in our oceans or to wildlife. This disconnect between individual actions and tangible outcomes can make sustainable habits feel insignificant or invisible, even though they are meaningfully contributing to reducing plastic pollution, especially in our oceans.¹⁴ 

Solutions 

One way to address a potential lack of feedback is to create intentional, and possibly internal, systems of reflection and visibility. For example, tracking your progress, such as noting how many single-use plastics you’ve avoided in a week or monitoring your energy or water usage, can help make your seemingly invisible impacts more tangible. One of the apps that I enjoy using to track my plastic consumption is called Remora. It allows you to track whether you use or avoid different plastics, and it can even specify which type of plastic.¹⁵ It also functions like a social media app, letting you exchange kudos (or praise) with your friends for avoiding different types of plastic, providing positive feedback, and reinforcing sustainable habits. 

Finally, storytelling often plays a powerful role in seeing how others’ small actions have added up over time and can remind individuals that change is happening, even if it’s not immediately visible to them. Creating a space on social media, or within close peer groups, to share personal wins and celebrate others’ achievements can help spark a ripple effect of encouragement and motivation. This leads us to our next section on the social barriers that we often can face.

 

Social 

_______________________________________________________________________

The social environment we are surrounded by, whether it is friends and family or social media and online platforms, plays an influential role in shaping how we think about and practice sustainability. Social trends and expectations can create subtle but powerful pressures that make it harder to make sustainable choices. In this section, I explore two key social barriers; the influence of societal pressure in consumer decisions and how social media trends often encourage overconsumption. Understanding how these factors shape our behaviors can help us identify strategies to disregard these influences and foster more mindful, sustainable habits in our own lives and communities.

Social Pressure  

Social pressure plays a significant role in shaping our behavior around sustainability, as people often feel the need to conform to the actions and values of those around them.¹⁶ Whether it is in a social group, a workplace, or a community, people may choose not to adopt sustainable habits if they believe that those around them aren’t prioritizing the environment, especially if such actions are seen as “out of the norm” or “weird”. This often creates a cycle where unsustainable choices feel more acceptable or even expected by those around you. 

I myself have noticed this dynamic in my own personal life, typically when I go out to eat with my friends. While I usually try to avoid plastic as much as I can, when I’m around my friends, I tend to catch myself making excuses for getting things in plastic to-go containers or leaving my reusable cup at home when we walk to get coffee. Even if it may be subconscious, there’s a part of me that worries I might be judged by my friends if I bring my own containers or ask to skip the plastic. These small, subtle moments help reflect how social pressure can shape our decisions, even when we do care about sustainability. 

Solutions 

One way that I have been able to overcome this barrier in my own life is by reminding myself that even though I might feel awkward implementing these sustainable choices initially, it often inspires curiosity and maybe even replicated behaviors from others. Over time, these somewhat small acts have helped normalize these behaviours within my friend group. And it has. Sometimes, even all of my friends bring a reusable cup with us on our coffee walks. You just need to have courage in yourself to be the one to lead first by example.

 

Additionally, another potential solution to overcoming social pressure is to surround oneself with people who share similar environmental values. Being a part of a like-minded group can help reinforce good, sustainable habits, give you positive peer feedback, and provide you with the motivation needed to stay committed. Furthermore, each of us can play a pivotal role in inspiring others by highlighting the benefits of sustainable choices, embodying those values through our actions, and sparking meaningful, constructive conversations about the urgency of environmental stewardship. When sustainability becomes a shared value within a community, the social pressure shifts from discouraging green actions to encouraging them.

 

Social Media Trends in Consumption 

Something that we all might recognize the most is that social media trends have a very powerful influence on consumer behavior, repeatedly fueling overconsumption through the constant promotion of new products, changing aesthetics, and impulse-driven buying.¹⁷ Instagram, TikTok, and YouTube frequently showcase the newest “must-have” items that are tied to ever-changing trends. This constant influence and trust that consumers have in online influencers encourages people to purchase products without researching the product’s sustainability or the brand’s ethical practices.¹⁸ This fast-changing, aesthetic-based culture can make mindful consumption feel out of step or less exciting than the alternative of instant gratification felt from purchasing the newest fashion trend after seeing it online. 

Solutions 

To avoid the daily overconsumption trap fueled by social media, we must recognize that we don’t need to participate in every trend or seek instant gratification. Instead, embracing mindful consumption means slowing down, asking questions about what and why we buy, and choosing products that align with our values. A helpful practice to reinforce this mindset is adopting a 24-hour rule or a buffer period of some amount of time, which allows you time to think critically about whether the purchase is worth making or if it is an impulse buy. This buffer time also allows you to search for alternatives, potentially finding better or more sustainable options. 

Additionally, something that I have begun to practice is keeping a list of all wished-for items that I want to purchase. When I feel the urge to purchase something or treat myself, this list makes it easier to make an environmentally conscious decision when there are products already outlined for me. This method also allows me to take time before making purchases to evaluate how badly I need or want the product. And, overall, developing the mindset that small and consistent actions still matter, whether skipping a trendy item or supporting a sustainable brand, helps foster long-term habits that resist the pressure of overconsumption and support more intentional living. 

Finally, we can always “change the algorithm” on Instagram, Facebook, and other platforms by following brands and influencers whose messaging focuses on mindful consumption and care for the environment. It can also be an important step in developing an online community of climate enthusiasts and environmentalists. Surrounding yourself with climate news and like-minded people who provide ways to take action can positively impact your climate action potential. 

Social media can be an important executor of positive influence and change. When used intentionally, it has the potential to normalize sustainable habits and make climate action more accessible to a greater number of people. It may not always lead to major changes in our behavior, but it can be a step in the right direction for some and can have a powerful influence on the media that people consume daily.¹⁹ 

 

Values and Priorities 

_______________________________________________________________________

Our values and priorities are incredibly impactful in shaping how we make choices every day, especially when it comes to sustainability. Even people who care deeply about the environment can face barriers that cause them to prioritize convenience, affordability, and habit over their environmental values. This section explores two of those most common challenges: a desire for convenience and the financial costs often associated with sustainable alternatives. Understanding these barriers and exploring practical solutions can help us learn how to better align our values with our actions in ways that are realistic and sustainable for our everyday lives. 

Convenience

In our time-busy, money-stretched world, choosing what products are more convenient over sustainably-focused options is a common barrier. Sustainable options often require more planning, research, or effort. Whether it’s bringing your own containers, shopping at local farmers’ markets, or learning how to recycle properly, making sustainable choices today often requires sacrificing time, convenience, or familiarity. When people are overwhelmed, busy, or uncertain about what the “right” choice is, they tend to default to what’s easiest and most familiar to them.²⁰ This habit continues to be reinforced by systems that are designed for speed and efficiency rather than sustainability.²¹ 

 

Solutions 

Addressing this challenge requires us to make sustainable choices easier and more accessible to the everyday consumer and to continue to normalize and integrate sustainability into daily routines. That way, convenience and sustainability don’t feel like opposing forces. One way to overcome this barrier is to organize/make a plan ahead of time. For instance, creating a sustainable “go bag” to keep in your car or next to the door for when you leave on foot, by bike, or by public transit. This could include a reusable water bottle, coffee mug, utensils, containers, and whatever else can replace disposable items you commonly purchase. This method makes them quick and easy to access.

Similar concepts can be applied inside your home. Maybe make or print a recycling guide for your local area. It can be difficult to remember which items are recyclable if you are not already knowledgeable on the subject, especially as recycling guidelines can change based on where you live (and many companies will market their products as recyclable when they really are not). I’ve included an example of a recycling guide; this one is provided by San Luis Obispo County, California, and has guidelines for the three bins used in the county. You can often find more in-depth recycling guides on the website of your local waste management organization. 

Explore apps that may help streamline sustainable living for you, such as Too Good To Go, which helps reduce food waste by offering surplus meals from local restaurants, or Commons, which tracks your carbon footprint and suggests lower-impact alternatives for you. 

Finally, implementing smaller and more convenient swaps that fit naturally into your routine, like switching to bulk refills at a local grocery store, can make sustainability feel more manageable and less overwhelming overall. These simple shifts can help you gradually build lasting habits without requiring major lifestyle changes all at once.

 

Financial Cost  

The financial cost of sustainability remains one of the most persistent barriers to behavior change, even for those who are already environmentally conscious. Many sustainable products, such as reusable alternatives to everyday products, ethically sourced goods, or organic foods, all come with a higher upfront cost—for the most part. This reinforces the belief that sustainability itself is expensive or is only attainable for those with the financial privilege to purchase trendy eco-friendly products. A survey conducted by members of Deloitte’s research team, the auditing and consulting company, found evidence that this perception can discourage people from making eco-conscious decisions, especially when both affordable and convenient options are available, even if unsustainable.²² However, this mindset frequently overlooks the long-term savings and value that sustainable choices offer the consumer. The challenge is in shifting the current narrative away from sustainability as a luxury and more towards sustainability as a smart, long-term investment.

Solutions 

Being sustainable, however, doesn’t have to come at a high cost to you as a consumer. In fact, the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) highlights that sustainable waste management begins with (1) reducing your consumption and waste, (2) reusing the things that you already have, and then (3) recycling waste at the end of its life cycle.²³ Some of the most impactful sustainable practices, like consuming less, repairing items instead of replacing them, borrowing instead of buying, and shopping secondhand, can all be financially beneficial. Shifting your focus away from “buying green” to living intentionally and mindfully helps reframe sustainability as a mindset, rather than as an expensive product category. 

To overcome this financial yet mental barrier, it’s important to emphasize that sustainability isn’t about buying more, especially not expensive eco-friendly replacements, but about making the most of what we already have, since reusing and extending the life of the items we already own is often the most sustainable (and affordable) choice. It’s really about buying less and buying smarter. Small changes like choosing the quality of a product over the quantity of it, repairing instead of replacing, and reducing our overall consumption can significantly lower our expenses over time. 

For instance, shopping second-hand, borrowing items through tool libraries or community swap groups, and buying in bulk are all practical and affordable ways to live your life sustainably. Reframing sustainable living as not only environmentally necessary but also financially beneficial makes it more accessible to a broader audience. As environmentalists, we can lead by example, sharing budget-friendly eco tips, supporting local reuse initiatives, and continuing to remind others that sustainability can be found in the items that we already own, not the ones that are being marketed to us. 

 

In Summary

_______________________________________________________________________

Most of us here are already deeply aware of the climate crisis and the systemic forces that perpetuate it. But even within this movement, we are not immune to all of the psychological and social barriers that can complicate our behavior change. In many ways, the challenge isn’t just knowing what the right choices are; it’s figuring out how to consistently live them out in a world that often doesn’t make it easy. Things like misinformation, social pressure, overconsumption fueled by social media, convenience, and perceived financial burdens can all shape the gap between intention and action. Recognizing these barriers doesn’t mean that we are failing; it means that we’re human and it gives us the insight needed to push past guilt and refocus our energy on creating conscious, intentional action. 

It is important to give yourself grace when learning to change your habits and acknowledge that we are all continuously learning and evolving. Habits take time to break and to form, and it may not be possible to see all of the changes you’ve made immediately. Critically, as we move forward, our work lies not only in shifting our own habits but also in using our awareness to create supportive and accessible pathways for others to do so. That means uplifting our stories of progress, sharing tools that make sustainable living easier, and not being afraid of discussing our imperfections as a part of the journey. It means holding space for nuance, compassion, and the understanding that even small acts do indeed ripple outward. Systems change is essential, but individual action has the power to influence culture and innovation, and to demand accountability from those who can make vast changes to our system.

---

Footnotes

1. https://www.un.org/en/climatechange/science/causes-effects-climate-change
2. https://earth.org/fast-fashion-and-emissions-whats-the-link/
3. https://ourworldindata.org/environmental-impacts-of-food
4. https://www.thestreet.com/retail/target-struggles-to-reverse-alarming-customer-trend-amid-boycotts
5. https://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S2352154621000309
6. https://www.greenqueen.com.hk/europe-meat-consumption-plant-based-vegan-survey/#:~:text=More%20than%20half%20(52%25),a%20new%20survey%20has%20found
7. file:///Users/jordynhazard/Downloads/study_id70192_meat-trends-in-europe.pdf
8. ibid
9. https://www.apa.org/topics/journalism-facts/misinformation-disinformation
10. https://www.desmog.com/2024/08/14/uk-advertising-standards-authority-regulator-greenwashing-allegations-shell-ads/
11. https://www.theguardian.com/environment/2019/oct/09/revealed-20-firms-third-carbon-emissions
12. https://www.td.org/content/atd-blog/5-barriers-to-behavior-change
13. https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/epdf/10.1080/13504620220145401?needAccess=true
14. ibid
15. https://www.getremora.org/
16. https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/behavioural-public-policy/article/abs/how-social-norms-are-often-a-barrier-to-addressing-climate-change-but-can-be-part-of-the-solution/90BCDC030D23B9CE5078FB025EEBECCB
17. https://sentientmedia.org/overconsumption/
18. https://mauconline.net/understanding-the-psychology-behind-consumer-decision-making/#:~:text=People%20often%20make%20purchasing%20decisions,cognitive%20biases%20when%20making%20decisions
19. https://www.forbes.com/sites/shephyken/2022/10/09/the-power-of-instagram/
20. https://journal.lib.uoguelph.ca/index.php/surg/article/view/983/1430
21. https://futureearth.org/networks/global-research-networks/systems-of-sustainable-consumption-and-production/
22. https://www.deloitte.com/us/en/insights/industry/retail-distribution/consumer-behavior-trends-state-of-the-consumer-tracker/sustainable-products-and-practices-for-green-living.html
23. https://www.epa.gov/recycle

Header Photo by Bhautik Patel on Unsplash

 

---

 

Jordyn Hazard is a senior at California Polytechnic State University, San Luis Obispo, studying Business Administration with a concentration in Marketing and a minor in Sustainable Agriculture. She is deeply passionate about addressing our current environmental crisis, the impacts of consumerism, and all things climate-related.